Asset Allocation
Find the right asset allocation for zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.30% | 0.09% | 8.18% | 8.17% | 23.42% | 19.88% | 11.91% | 13.45% |
Portfolio zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs | 0.53% | 0.21% | 8.98% | 9.04% | 25.57% | — | — | — |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
BIGY YieldMax Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF | 0.15% | 0.19% | 4.74% | 5.05% | 22.88% | — | — | — |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 1.46% | 0.97% | 14.88% | 14.06% | 33.04% | — | — | — |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 0.29% | 0.38% | 8.17% | 8.56% | 22.98% | — | — | — |
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 0.82% | 0.38% | 12.27% | 11.67% | 32.02% | — | — | — |
OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.14% | -0.14% | 10.47% | 10.55% | 29.22% | 23.11% | 13.78% | — |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 1.27% | -0.05% | 9.93% | 9.25% | 25.86% | — | — | — |
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | 0.30% | 0.11% | 5.97% | 6.55% | 20.24% | 15.60% | — | — |
TSPY TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF | 0.24% | 0.11% | 6.27% | 6.48% | 23.65% | — | — | — |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Nov 21, 2024, zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs's average daily return is +0.07%, while the average monthly return is +1.29%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 4.5 years.
Historically, 65% of months were positive and 35% were negative. The best month was Apr 2026 with a return of +9.5%, while the worst month was Mar 2025 at -5.9%. The longest winning streak lasted 9 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.
On a daily basis, zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs closed higher 60% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +9.5%, while the worst single day was Apr 4, 2025 at -5.8%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.67% | -0.51% | -4.35% | 9.46% | 5.21% | -2.19% | 8.98% | ||||||
| 2025 | 2.48% | -1.47% | -5.85% | -0.45% | 6.06% | 4.59% | 2.39% | 2.10% | 3.45% | 2.71% | 0.29% | 0.39% | 17.40% |
| 2024 | 1.71% | -1.99% | -0.31% |
Benchmark Metrics
zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs has an annualized alpha of 1.57%, beta of 0.98, and R2 of 0.99 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since November 21, 2024.
- This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (98.57%) than losses (89.07%) - typical of diversified or defensive assets.
- With beta of 0.98 and R2 of 0.99, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index - much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.
- Alpha
- 1.57%
- Beta
- 0.98
- R²
- 0.99
- Upside Capture
- 98.57%
- Downside Capture
- 89.07%
Expense Ratio
zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs has an expense ratio of 0.61%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs ranks 60 for risk / return — on par with similar Portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.17 | 1.94 | +0.24 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 2.63 | +0.28 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.35 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 2.59 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.90 | 11.84 | +3.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIGY YieldMax Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF | 68 | 2.12 | 2.86 | 1.39 | 2.76 | 10.76 |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 79 | 2.36 | 3.06 | 1.43 | 3.49 | 15.21 |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 76 | 2.22 | 3.03 | 1.42 | 2.99 | 14.96 |
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 76 | 2.13 | 2.93 | 1.37 | 3.83 | 15.82 |
OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF | 72 | 2.06 | 2.73 | 1.37 | 3.36 | 14.80 |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 64 | 1.91 | 2.48 | 1.36 | 2.70 | 11.98 |
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | 70 | 2.06 | 2.78 | 1.40 | 2.63 | 13.60 |
TSPY TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF | 65 | 1.99 | 2.74 | 1.37 | 2.47 | 10.91 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs provided a 10.39% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 10.39% | 9.83% | 7.86% | 3.68% | 1.60% | 0.65% | 0.44% | 0.09% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
BIGY YieldMax Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF | 11.91% | 12.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.60% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.13% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 13.65% | 14.05% | 8.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF | 6.33% | 2.99% | 3.10% | 3.33% | 3.85% | 3.63% | 2.43% | 0.50% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.61% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | 11.83% | 11.70% | 12.04% | 12.01% | 4.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSPY TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF | 14.06% | 13.69% | 3.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs was 19.02%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. Recovery took 55 trading sessions.
The current zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs drawdown is 2.60%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 selloff2025 | -19.02%Apr 2025 | 1mo 17d | 2mo 20d | 4mo 7dFeb 2025 - Jun 2025 |
2026 pullback2026 | -8.23%Mar 2026 | 2mo | 15d | 2mo 15dJan 2026 - Apr 2026 |
2025 pullback2025 | -5.21%Nov 2025 | 21d | 14d | 1mo 5dOct 2025 - Dec 2025 |
2025 pullback2025 | -3.84%Jan 2025 | 29d | 12d | 1mo 11dDec 2024 - Jan 2025 |
2026 pullback2026 | -3.11%Jun 2026 | 2d | — | 6d 11hJun 2026 - now |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 8 assets, with an effective number of assets of 6.55, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 1.03 | 1.02 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.02, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.
zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024 | 0.99 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. SPYI has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.99, while IWMI has the lowest at 0.82.
Asset Correlations Table
| IWMI | TSPY | BIGY | GPIQ | QQQI | OVL | GPIX | SPYI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWMI | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| TSPY | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.92 |
| BIGY | 0.70 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.93 |
| GPIQ | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| QQQI | 0.75 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| OVL | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.98 |
| GPIX | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.98 |
| SPYI | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.00 |
Find what zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs is missing
See which holdings overlap, where zold $1a FID CMA 2027 part II income ETFs is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification